Sunday, June 23, 2013

Add 2 billion investors lost money calls at the Vietnam Securities


 
 Securities deliberation of the Vietnamese workers (DVSC) misappropriating clients' money has just added some new circumstances, with sudden movements.



    
DVSC "proceedings" against investors



    
In relation to suspicious employees DVSC 900 million appropriated by two clients open trading account at the Company's and Le Thi Uyen Tran Ngoc Cuong (Ha Noi), DVSC just suddenly switch profile "element "back customers with fraudulent appropriation of property to the City Police DVSC. Hanoi. Earlier, the investors filed two employees accused DVSC 900 million appropriation to the City Police investigation. Ha Noi (see ĐTCK 72 to 17/6).




    
As the person authorized to resolve DVSC abuse of trust money appropriated by the client company employee caused, lawyer Nguyen Thanh Cong, director of the East Law Firm Ltd said on 19/6 last , moved DVSC profile accused Kim Dang Khoa, deputy director of the Hanoi branch DVSC colluded with Ms. Yuan and Mr. Cuong made fraudulent appropriation of property DVSC.



    
"DVSC transfer record to denounce the police, because after learning that information carefully, not merely of the Faculty he appropriated 900 million as investors accused of, but there are signs that And he has hooked up with Ms. Yuan and Mr. Cuong made fraudulent appropriation of property. To be precise conclusions about the responsibilities of the parties involved, thanks to DVSC to the police, "says says.








            At DVSC, is calling investors lost a total of 4 billion account 2 - Photo: Hoai Nam



    
According to Yuan, her strength and he has tried many times to contact Ms. Hoang Thi Tam, DVSC CEO and other executives of the Company, to clarify doubts from DVSC, as well as to prove innocence his involvement in the incident, but the DVSC off all contact.



    
In this regard, he the said Department by doubts his accomplice Mrs Uyen and Cuong made fraudulent appropriation of property DVSC, so in principle, DVSC can not provide evidence for his Uyen and her strength, but only send the investigating agencies.



    
One of the pressing questions above two investors, Ms. Hoang Thi Tam, CEO DVSC promised to pay investors before 20/6, out of date, but why has not the company pay? According to the, when the incident occurred, on the basis of information from customers and denounce learn preliminary information, DVSC assessment of the case under the responsibility of his Department, should have promised that, on the basis of clarify the responsibilities of the staff DVSC, the Company will pay to the customer. However, after learning of his relationship skills and customer Sciences, is a sign that he hooked up with Ms. Yuan Science and Cuong made fraudulent appropriation of property DVSC. Thus, during the wait for the police investigation to clarify the responsibilities of the parties involved, DVSC could not pay investors.



    
On the move "elements" of DVSC back, she emphasized Uyen, DVSC suspicions are unfounded, because if his accomplices Faculty of withdrawal, there is no reason for investors to make complaints against case to the public security organs. Doing so is going to get yourself facing jail.

    

    
Add 2 investors lost money call




    
One other unexpected circumstances are just two more investors "elements" of DVSC employees misappropriating 1.1 billion, also with the same tricks as in the case of Ms. Yuan and Mr. Cuong.



    
Investors Ngo Minh V. (Ha Noi), said more than a month ago, he was really shocked to notify employees of DVSC, the entire amount of 1.1 billion in his account and another account that his relatives has been transferred to his account of Sciences. Shortly thereafter, he met his look of Sciences to learn, but he is trying to avoid. He then contacted Ms. Hoang Thi Tam, CEO DVSC and receive a promise to pay in the month 5/2013. However, the DVSC has yet to pay him.



    
"On 21/6, we went to the branch in Hanoi DVSC request in account statements, as well as to settle for misappropriating client assets, but does not meet the person responsible for the DVSC. DVSC Staff refused to print account statements for reasons we can not access the computer system, "said V. talk and said he will work with his strength and appeal to her Uyen State Securities Commission, as well as investigating agencies.



    
Evolution of the incident will be updated when ĐTCK new circumstances.

No comments:

Post a Comment